Evidence snapshot reviewed Sep 5, 2026GitHub checked Aug 21, 2026
Source-reviewedStandalone SkillAutomation & AgentsCodex Profile

publish

Convert an Ouroboros Seed into a reviewed GitHub Epic and linked implementation tasks.

At a glance

What it does

Convert an Ouroboros Seed into a reviewed GitHub Epic and linked implementation tasks.

Capabilities
Automation & AgentsWorkflow AutomationIntegrationsDocumentation

Before you choose it

Use this skill when a Seed specification is ready to become an actionable GitHub work plan. It finds a YAML interview Seed or JSON PM Seed, maps its goals and criteria into an Epic and task issues, checks for likely duplicates, and asks you to approve the issue structure before creating anything.

Best for

Teams using Ouroboros Seeds to plan implementation work in GitHub.

Common tasks

  • Publish a newly generated Seed as a GitHub Epic with task issues.
  • Turn PM Seed user stories and success criteria into tracked implementation work.
  • Publish to a repository other than the current checkout after selecting its owner/repo.

Permissions and data

Uses the GitHub CLI to read repository and issue information, then creates GitHub artifacts only after interactive confirmation.

Permissions
  • Access to a local Seed file or the Ouroboros seed directory.
  • GitHub CLI (`gh`) installed and authenticated.
  • Write access to the selected GitHub repository.
Data handling
  • Reads Seed goals, constraints, acceptance criteria, metadata, and related planning fields.
  • Places Seed-derived content and its identifier in created GitHub issue bodies.
External services
  • GitHub, through the GitHub CLI.
Credentials
  • An authenticated `gh` CLI session with permission to create labels, issues, and comments in the target repository.

Limitations

  • Requires an existing YAML or JSON Seed; it does not generate the Seed itself.
  • Stops if GitHub CLI is unavailable or unauthenticated.
  • Duplicate detection is based on the Seed identifier and may still require your judgment.
  • The skill document states it creates new issues only; it does not modify existing issues except by adding a task-links comment to the newly created Epic.

What DSHub checked

  • The pinned skill document defines YAML and JSON Seed support, repository selection, duplicate checks, review prompts, and GitHub issue creation.
  • The source snapshot is pinned to a specific Git commit.
  • An MIT license was detected.

What DSHub did not check

  • This candidate was not installed or executed by DSHub.
  • GitHub CLI availability, authentication, and repository permissions were not verified.

Pinned install

Primary action

This standalone skill does not have a DSH Plugin install action. Use its source documentation for the delivery method.

Visit the source project

Maintainer source

Skill instructions

View at commit 03714ba
Maintainer-authored contentCaptured from skills/publish/SKILL.md on Sep 5, 2026. The text and repository-relative media are fixed to commit 03714ba44618 with content hash d6469d708938; provider-hosted badges may update independently. SKILL.md commands are upstream documentation; use the type-correct primary action above and verify it against this pinned source.

name: publish description: "Publish Seed specification as GitHub Issues for team-based project management"

/ouroboros:publish

Convert a Seed specification into structured GitHub Issues for team workflows.

Usage

ooo publish [seed_path]
/ouroboros:publish [seed_path]

Trigger keywords: "publish to github", "create issues from seed", "seed to issues"

Instructions

When the user invokes this skill:

Step 1: Prerequisite Check

1a. Verify gh CLI is installed:

command -v gh >/dev/null 2>&1 && echo "OK" || echo "MISSING"

If missing, tell the user:

GitHub CLI (gh) is not installed.
Install it: https://cli.github.com/

Stop.

1b. Verify gh is authenticated:

gh auth status

If not authenticated, tell the user:

GitHub CLI is not authenticated. Run: gh auth login

Stop.

Step 2: Locate the Seed

Ouroboros stores seeds in ~/.ouroboros/seeds/:

  • Interview seeds: ~/.ouroboros/seeds/{seed_id}.yaml (YAML)
  • PM seeds: ~/.ouroboros/seeds/pm_seed_{id}.json (JSON)

Determine the Seed source in this priority order:

  1. Explicit path argument: If the user provided a file path (.yaml or .json), read it directly
  2. Most recent seed file: Search for the most recent seed in the standard location:
    ls -t ~/.ouroboros/seeds/*.yaml ~/.ouroboros/seeds/*.json 2>/dev/null | head -5
    
    If multiple seeds exist, present the top candidates via AskUserQuestion and let the user choose.
  3. Conversation context: If ooo seed or ooo pm was just run in this conversation and the seed path was reported, use that path.

If no seed is found:

No Seed found. Run `ooo seed` or `ooo pm` first to generate a specification.

Stop.

Step 3: Parse the Seed

Detect the file format by extension and parse accordingly:

For YAML seeds (from ooo interview + ooo seed): Read the YAML file and extract:

  • goal → Epic title and description
  • constraints → Listed in Epic body
  • acceptance_criteria → Checklist items in Epic + distributed to Task issues
  • ontology_schema → Documentation section in Epic
  • evaluation_principles → Quality criteria reference
  • exit_conditions → Definition of Done
  • metadata.ambiguity_score → Confidence indicator
  • metadata.seed_id → Used for duplicate detection

For JSON seeds (from ooo pm): Read the JSON file and extract fields using the actual PMSeed schema:

PMSeed field Maps to
pm_id Seed identifier (for duplicate detection)
product_name Epic title prefix
goal Epic Goal section
constraints Epic Constraints section (array of strings)
success_criteria Acceptance Criteria checklist (array of strings)
user_stories User Stories section (array of {persona, action, benefit})
deferred_items Deferred Items section (array of strings)
decide_later_items Open Questions section (array of strings)
assumptions Assumptions section (array of strings)

Format user stories as: "As a {persona}, I want to {action}, so that {benefit}."

If any field is missing or empty, omit that section from the Epic body rather than failing.

Step 4: Detect Repository

4a. Attempt auto-detection from current directory:

gh repo view --json nameWithOwner -q '.nameWithOwner' 2>/dev/null

4b. Present the target repo choice via AskUserQuestion:

If auto-detection succeeded:

{
  "questions": [{
    "question": "Publish Seed as GitHub Issues to this repository?",
    "header": "Target Repository",
    "options": [
      {"label": "<detected_repo>", "description": "Use current repository"},
      {"label": "Other", "description": "I'll specify a different owner/repo"}
    ],
    "multiSelect": false
  }]
}

If auto-detection failed (not in a git repo):

{
  "questions": [{
    "question": "Which GitHub repository should the issues be created in? (format: owner/repo)",
    "header": "Target Repository"
  }]
}

If the user chose "Other", ask:

{
  "questions": [{
    "question": "Enter the target repository (format: owner/repo):",
    "header": "Target Repository"
  }]
}

Store the resolved repository as TARGET_REPO. All subsequent gh commands MUST include -R <TARGET_REPO> to ensure they target the correct repository.

Step 5: Duplicate Check

Before creating issues, check if this seed was already published:

gh issue list -R <TARGET_REPO> --label "ouroboros" --state all --search "<seed_id or pm_id>" --limit 5 --json number,title,state

The search uses the seed's unique identifier (metadata.seed_id for YAML seeds, pm_id for JSON seeds). This works because Step 7 persists the identifier in the Epic body (see the Seed ID field in the Epic template).

If matching issues are found, warn the user via AskUserQuestion:

{
  "questions": [{
    "question": "Found existing Ouroboros issues that may be from the same seed:\n\n<list of matching issues>\n\nCreate new issues anyway?",
    "header": "Duplicate Warning",
    "options": [
      {"label": "Create anyway", "description": "Proceed with new issues"},
      {"label": "Cancel", "description": "Do not create duplicate issues"}
    ],
    "multiSelect": false
  }]
}

If "Cancel": Stop.

Step 6: Plan Issue Structure

Before creating issues, present the planned structure to the user for review.

6a. Break down acceptance criteria into Task groups:

Analyze the acceptance criteria and group them into logical implementation units. Each unit becomes a Task issue. Use your understanding of the domain to create meaningful groupings (e.g., group by feature area, layer, or dependency order).

6b. Present the plan via AskUserQuestion:

{
  "questions": [{
    "question": "Here's the planned issue structure:\n\n**Epic**: <goal summary>\n\n**Tasks**:\n1. <task_1_title> — <brief scope>\n2. <task_2_title> — <brief scope>\n3. <task_3_title> — <brief scope>\n\nProceed with creating these issues?",
    "header": "Issue Plan",
    "options": [
      {"label": "Create issues", "description": "Publish to GitHub now"},
      {"label": "Modify plan", "description": "I want to adjust the structure first"}
    ],
    "multiSelect": false
  }]
}

If "Modify plan": Ask what to change, adjust, and re-present.

Step 7: Create GitHub Issues

IMPORTANT: Every gh command in this step MUST include -R <TARGET_REPO>.

Issue number extraction: gh issue create outputs a URL like https://github.com/owner/repo/issues/42. Extract the issue number by parsing the trailing digits:

EPIC_URL=$(gh issue create -R <TARGET_REPO> --title "..." --label "..." --body "...")
EPIC_NUM=$(echo "$EPIC_URL" | grep -o '[0-9]*$')

Apply the same extraction pattern for every Task issue created.

7a. Create labels (if they don't exist):

gh label create "ouroboros" -R <TARGET_REPO> --description "Created by Ouroboros publish" --color "6f42c1" 2>/dev/null || true
gh label create "epic" -R <TARGET_REPO> --description "Epic / parent issue" --color "0075ca" 2>/dev/null || true
gh label create "task" -R <TARGET_REPO> --description "Implementation task" --color "008672" 2>/dev/null || true

7b. Create the Epic issue:

gh issue create -R <TARGET_REPO> \
  --title "[Epic] <goal_summary>" \
  --label "ouroboros,epic" \
  --body "$(cat <<'BODY'
## Goal

<goal from seed>

## Constraints

<constraints as bullet list>

## Acceptance Criteria

- [ ] <criterion_1>
- [ ] <criterion_2>
- ...

## Ontology

| Field | Type | Description |
|-------|------|-------------|
| <field_name> | <type> | <description> |

## Evaluation Principles

| Principle | Weight | Description |
|-----------|--------|-------------|
| <name> | <weight> | <description> |

## Exit Conditions

<exit conditions as bullet list>

---

**Seed ID**: `<seed_id or pm_id>` | **Ambiguity Score**: <score> | **Seed**: `<seed_file_path>`
*Generated by [Ouroboros](https://github.com/Q00/ouroboros) via `ooo publish`*
BODY
)"

Capture the Epic issue number from the output.

7c. Create Task issues (one per implementation unit):

For each task:

gh issue create -R <TARGET_REPO> \
  --title "[Task] <task_title>" \
  --label "ouroboros,task" \
  --body "$(cat <<'BODY'
Parent: #<epic_number>

## Scope

<what this task covers>

## Acceptance Criteria

- [ ] <specific_criterion_1>
- [ ] <specific_criterion_2>

## Test Checklist

- [ ] <test_1>
- [ ] <test_2>
- [ ] <test_3>

## Pass Criteria

<measurable conditions for this task to be considered done>

---

*Part of [Epic] #<epic_number> | Generated by [Ouroboros](https://github.com/Q00/ouroboros) via `ooo publish`*
BODY
)"

7d. Update Epic with task links:

After all tasks are created, add a comment to the Epic:

gh issue comment <epic_number> -R <TARGET_REPO> --body "$(cat <<'BODY'
## Implementation Tasks

- [ ] #<task_1_number> — <task_1_title>
- [ ] #<task_2_number> — <task_2_title>
- [ ] #<task_3_number> — <task_3_title>

Track overall progress by checking off tasks as their issues are closed.
BODY
)"

Step 8: Summary

Present the results:

Published to <TARGET_REPO>:

  #<epic>  [Epic] <goal_summary>
    ├── #<task_1>  [Task] <task_1_title>
    ├── #<task_2>  [Task] <task_2_title>
    └── #<task_3>  [Task] <task_3_title>

View: https://github.com/<TARGET_REPO>/issues/<epic>

Then suggest next steps:

Next steps:
  - Assign tasks to team members on GitHub
  - Use GitHub Projects board for tracking
  - Run `ooo run` for AI-assisted implementation of individual tasks

Notes

  • No MCP required: This skill works entirely through gh CLI
  • Non-destructive: Creates new issues only, never modifies existing ones
  • Cross-repo support: All gh commands use -R <TARGET_REPO>, so seeds can be published to any repository the user has write access to
  • Works with both seed formats: YAML seeds from ooo seed and JSON seeds from ooo pm are both supported — the parser auto-detects format by file extension

RFC #1392 State Breadcrumb Footer

Your final response MUST end with exactly one breadcrumb footer line:

◆ <current state> → next: <recommended action>

Derive <current state> from live session state via ouroboros_session_status when that MCP projection is available; otherwise derive it from this skill's actual outcome. Never use a linear Step N of M footer because Ouroboros is an evolutionary loop. When the next action is genuinely a choice, list 2-3 honest options in the next: clause. The breadcrumb line must be the last line of the response.

Operate deliberately

Install and manage

Prerequisites and target Profile

Target Codex Profile

Delivery Skill Files — https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Q00/ouroboros/03714ba446186423dcb46e25d12bd19c3a2e82f6/skills/publish/SKILL.md

Compatibility and access

Requires GitHub CLI authentication and repository write access Not declared in supplied evidence

Review compatibility evidence

Risk facts

External Write

Creates GitHub labels, issues, and an Epic comment after confirmation.

Evidence
Local Data Access

Reads a supplied Seed file or searches the local Ouroboros seed directory.

Evidence
Evidence and editorial reviewManifest, Bundle patch, distribution and freshness

Immutable evidence

Review status and source activity

Human approved

Approved for publication after reviewing the source-linked content and immutable release record. AI assisted with the draft; the publication decision was human.

Human reviewed Sep 5, 2026, 5:19 PM UTCGitHub facts last checked Sep 5, 2026, 4:31 PM UTC

No material source change has been recorded since this evidence baseline.

Next step

Compare ecosystem artifact types

Subscribe to material changes for publish